Please Vote Legally in Montana
October 7th, 2008 by Wiley CodyThe Montana GOP is taking a lot of heat for asking the state of Montana to ensure that the lists of registered voters - the list of voters that will have a say in how Montanans choose to be governed - is accurate. The Gazette goes so far as to suggest that the cigar-filled-room-motive behind this effort is to reduce voter turnout. Please.
Over at Western Word, Jack does a great job of walking through these accusations with a little common sense.
The Gazette Editorial Board writes, “Those who receive the challenge letters initiated by the GOP ought to make a point of voting. We suggest that they encourage their friends, family and neighbors to vote, too.”
What the Gazette says is correct, but they failed to mention these people should be “legally” able to vote. I am sure the Gazette would like to see a fair and legal election.
Ultimately, though, it comes down to this simple fact. For every soldier or teacher or firefighter that the Democrats are parading in front of the media because they are asked to face the inconvenience of ensuring they are properly and legally registered, there is the possibility of that soldier’s or teacher’s or firefighter’s vote being negated by an illegally cast ballot from out of state.
A friend of mine did some data-mining in Helena. The State of Washington posts their voter roles online, so a comparison could be done. Out of those voters, at least fifteen were registered in both Washington and Montana - and that’s only a cross-section of one state. There are 48 other states that these voters may be duel-registered in.
Here are the 15 People currently registered in both Montana and Washington:
[Edit: I decided to remove the names since, as I originally said, these people have done nothing wrong; my point was merely to show that such people existed]
Now, I’m not suggesting that any of these people have or intend to do anything wrong. Certainly, it takes time for voter roles to update when someone moves, and there’s a good chance that most of these are people that have no intention of voting twice. There’s no way to tell if they have recently arrived in Montana or left. But if a single one of these voters does end up voting in two states, their illegal Montana vote may just as likely cancel as bolster the vote of a Montana soldier or teacher or firefighter. Or you.
So, on my behalf, the Montana GOP is asking 6,000 people to confirm their eligibility in Montana to cast a vote. Doing so helps ensure the sanctity of my vote - and yours. It’s prophylactic. And in Missoula, where the voting has already begun, it turns out the request isn’t that big a pill to swallow.
Among those challenged was Ian Mucci, 23, of Missoula, who has moved twice in the last year and run into all sorts of problems with the U.S. Postal Service delivering his mail.
He said that if voting involves an easy fix to the challenge, that’s OK. If it’s denying him the right to vote, he’ll take issue with the whole thing.
“I think it’s a pain in the butt, but it’s not like we are asked to give our blood or firstborn child,” he said.
Is this about voter suppression? Of course not! But if we’re going to throw that phrase out there, how much more likely is it that someone won’t vote if they don’t think their vote will be counted fairly?
Given the lengths to which Governor Brian Schweitzer bragged about going to secure his promise that Montana would elect Tester in 2006, Montanans need to be absolutely concerned about what he is willing to do in 2008. It’s worth noting that in the now infamous Philadelphia speech Schweitzer also guaranteed that Obama would win Montana. That’s a pretty big check Schweitzer wrote, and Montanans have heard first-hand the lengths he will take to cash it.
Update: Not sure where I got the idea that there were only 56 people challenged in Helena. That is, obviously, incorrect.