Drilling Off-Shore vs. Tourism
June 22nd, 2008 by Wiley CodySome Governors from the liberal coasts - whose populations expend more energy than the interior states as a result of their larger populations - have stated opposition to off-shore drilling in their back yards.
Governors in some coastal states promised to fight attempts to tap offshore petroleum reserves, citing concerns about the environment and tourism. Others agreed with President Bush’s call to lift a 27-year-old federal ban on offshore drilling but said states should decide whether to allow it.
The tree-hugger governors, pockets lined with tree-hugger dollars, are worried that a bunch of oil rigs off-shore will spoil the scenic perfection of the American coast. Here, now, with the magic of Photoshop, I give you a before and after perspective of the pristine California coast looking over the Pacific Ocean.

Now, steel yourself for the horrendous consequences of off-shore oil exploration. Heed this warning to click at your own risk. What you are about to see is the result of John McCain’s off-shore drilling proposal.
Ready?

Okay, if you’re having trouble seeing anything in the second picture, you’re not blind. You can’t because the off-shore exploration being proposed won’t be done within 50 miles of the shoreline. So I did some math. First I converted 50 miles to 43.5 nautical miles. Then I did some algebra with that fancy equation above. Here’s the reality in cold hard math.
In order to be visible from the shore line, an oil rig would have to rise 1,381 feet above the ocean’s surface.
1,381 feet is almost a quarter mile.
1,381 feet is less than 100 feet shorter than the Sears Tower.
1,381 feet is exactly (to the foot) as high as the Jin Mao Tower.
So either these new-fangled oil-rigs are absolutely massive, or some coastal governors are really bad at math.